http://www2.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAMPMBHC/2024/8.html 網頁Headnote : Kopnota The decision in S v F 1999 (1) SACR 571 (C) insofar as it relates to the meaning and interpretation of s 158 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, is clearly …
B Section 1583 gives the Court discretion to grant an...
網頁2008年9月17日 · Hoho pleaded not guilty to the 23 charges of criminal defamation that had been laid against him, but the Bisho High Court ultimately convicted him on 22. Hoho was sentenced to a prison term of three years suspended for five years and three years of correctional supervision. Hoho appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal and the matter … 網頁2024年3月28日 · IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG Case Number: A3069/2024 NOT REPORTABLE JUDGMENT STRYDOM, J Introduction [1] This appeal lies against a portion of the judgment and order of a Magistrate (the court a quo), handed … doctor\u0027s office rn salary
CHAPTER NINE PROTECTIVE MEASURES: In Camera Hearings, …
網頁2011年10月7日 · 2 2005 (1) SACR 571 (B) at page 576 D-E 3 See S v TSHABALALA 1999 (1) SACR 163 (T) 4 S v Wapota 1991 NR 353 (HC) – duty to inform unrepresented accused of statutory presumptions; S v Soabeb and Others 1992 NR 280 (HC) – duty to assist with cross-examination; S v Katari 2006 (1) NR 205 (HC) duty to inform accused of his right … 網頁did not strengthen the State's case. 6. Regarding the merits it was held in S v Van der Meyden1: "The onus of proof in the criminal case is discharged by the State if the evidence establishes the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Theis that 網頁InS v F1999 (1) SACR 571 (C) at 575 d g, Albertus AJ found that allowing a witness to testify through a closedcircuit television would in itself diminish or blunt the effectiveness of the crossexamination and that the accused's rights would be adversely affected. doctor\\u0027s office room flags